Our Mission Statement


"The Mission of Fox Valley Wellness is to facilitate a person's ability to reach a higher level of health and to promote wellness by identifying causes through mind, body and soul."





“The real winners in life are the people who look at every situation with an expectation that they can make it work or make it better.”
 Barbara Pletcher, author




Telephone Hours:
8 a.m-5:00 p.m. 

 

 

Please note:

Fox Valley Wellness Center/Midwest Hyperbarics will be closed on the following days in 2012:

Memorial Day, May 28th
July 4th
Labor Day, September 3rd 
Thanksgiving, November 22nd
Christmas, December 25th
Corruption in Research

Former editor-in-chief of the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM), Dr. Marcia Angell, has been quoted as saying, 

"It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authorative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of The New England Journal of Medicine." 

For a factinating article on why Dr. Angell came to this conclusion, read the article linked HERE.   
Natalya Murakhver, a New York food writer and mother of an 18-month year old daughter, loved her premium brand orange juice -- the "100 percent pure" and "not from concentrate" kind that comes in the colorful carton and tastes consistently delicious.

That is, until she said she learned from her first-time moms group that there's a "secret ingredient" in all premium orange juices that companies are not required to put on their labeling.

 Oldest Known Lyme? 
The November 2011 issue of National Geographic features a story about 'The Iceman', a mummified body found on the Austrian/Italian border in 1991. Recent examination reveals that The Iceman may be the oldest known Lyme Disease sufferer

Further, he may have used acupuncture as a healing modality, possibly for degenerative back pain!

Please follow the links provided above to read more about these facinating discoveries. 
Autism and Vaccines Researcher for CDC, Indicted for Fraud and Money-Laundering



SafeMinds demands long-overdue independent review of vaccine/autism research for data manipulation and conflicts of interest. Vaccine safety remains questionable.

 

ATLANTA, April 14, 2011 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- Poul Thorsen, the principal coordinator of multiple studies funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) used to deny a vaccine/autism link was indicted on April 13th on 13 counts of fraud and 9 counts of money-laundering.  The charges relate to funding for work he conducted for the CDC, which claimed to disprove associations between the mercury-based vaccine preservative, thimerosal, and increased rates of autism.

SafeMinds first voiced concerns in 2003 regarding a series of epidemiology studies out of Denmark and under the jurisdiction of Thorsen that provided the basis for the Institute of Medicine's claim that there was no association between thimerosal and autism.  That claim has been responsible for the continued unsafe use of mercury in influenza vaccines in the United States and infant vaccines around the world.

"The quality of this epidemiological research has always been questionable," states Sallie Bernard, SafeMinds president.  "Many biological studies support a link between mercury and autism, but these Danish studies have been used to suppress further research into thimerosal.  With clear evidence of Dr. Thorsen's lack of ethics, it is imperative to reopen this investigation."

From August to October of 2003, three articles on the autism-mercury controversy were published in close succession, all of which used data from a Danish registry for psychiatric research to assess the relationship between autism trends and the use of thimerosal. SafeMinds accessed the registry at the time and reported that a large percentage of diagnosed autism cases are lost from the Danish registry each year and that most of those lost cases were older children. Since the studies were  based on finding fewer older thimerosal-exposed children than younger unexposed children, the validity of their conclusion exonerating thimerosal in autism was questionable and likely a result of missing records rather than true lower incidence rates among the exposed group.  

In addition, internal emails obtained via FOIA document discussion between the Danish researchers and Thornsen which acknowledge that the studies did not include the latest data from 2001 where the incidence and prevalence of autism was declining which would be supportive of a vaccine connection.

The emails also include requests from Thornsen to CDC asking that the agency write letters to the journal Pediatrics encouraging them to publish the research after it had been rejected by other journals.

A top CDC official complied with the request sending a letter to the editor of the journal supporting the publication of the study which they called a "strong piece of evidence that thimerosal is not linked to autism."  

As fraud charges regarding Thorsen surface, and as we believe the registry was unreliable, SafeMinds is calling for an independent federal investigation of these studies for data manipulation and scientific misconduct.  Further background information on these studies, the charges against Dr. Thorsen, and documents obtained through the Freedom of Information Act that support SafeMinds' concerns are available on our website, www.safeminds.org.

 SOURCE SafeMinds


"The important thing is to not stop questioning." Albert Einstein

 Yearly Mammograms May Result In Many False Positives

Results of a recent study appearing in the Annals of Internal Medicine (Oct. 18, 2011) indicate that after a decade of annual mammography, more than half of women will receive at least one false-positive screen, and 7%-9% will receive a false-positive biopsy recommendation. 

According to ACP Internist Weekly

"Results also indicated that biennial screening appears to reduce these risks but may be associated with a small and not statistically significant absolute increase in the probability of of late-stage cancer diagnosis." 

and

"The study included 386,799 mammograms from 169,456 women. Nearly half (47.7%) of the women had only one screening mammogram; 11/8% had 5 or more. In the cohort, 9,331 women (5.5%) had only one year of follow-up and 4,891 (2.9%) were observed for 10 or more years."

Thermography is a noninvasive alternative that has been shown to be very effective in detecting abnormalities. Thermograms may be scheduled at Fox Valley Wellness Center/Midwest Hyperbarics™

The cholesterol controversy

Author: Daniel Duane- Men's Journal
Date: 12/05/2011
Words: 1604
Source: SMH
          Publication: Sydney Morning Herald
Section: Health & Science
Page: 17

Cholesterol kills - or so doctors have said for years. Having elevated levels of cholesterol, especially the unhealthy LDL, leads to cardiovascular disease, which in turn leads to angina, heart attack, heart failure and premature death.

Over the past several years, an increasing number of studies have started to raise doubts about this presumption. Cholesterol, a fatty chemical compound produced by the liver and found in some foods, is necessary to build cells and manufacture hormones but too much in the blood has been shown to clog arteries, increasing the risk of heart disease and stroke. But many experts now believe factors like nutrition and fitness play a more meaningful role in heart health and that having high lipid levels could be harmless for many people.

"The typical scenario is that you have a cholesterol test and your LDL comes back high, so your doctor tells you, 'Try exercising and eating less saturated fat'," says John Abramson, a physician, author and lecturer at Harvard Medical School. "You do, your LDL doesn't drop, so your doctor says, 'OK, let's put you on a statin and you won't have to worry about it.' But the truth is that eating a healthy diet and exercising, even if they don't lower LDL, will reduce your risk of heart disease many times more than taking a statin ever will."

In other words, most research hasn't shown that having high cholesterol alone causes heart disease - instead, it could just be a symptom of that condition, similar to how sweating can be a symptom of the flu.

Doctors point to the fact that 75 per cent of people who have heart attacks have healthy cholesterol, while most people with poor cholesterol numbers never suffer the heart trauma. The National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute's Framingham Heart Study - one of the US's largest, longest and most influential pieces of cholesterol research - did find that having high cholesterol before age 40 was associated with premature death but having the same numbers at age 50, 60, or 70 actually correlated with living longer.

All in all, says Christopher Gardner, a researcher at the Stanford University School of Medicine, having high cholesterol - even high LDL - is an "overblown risk factor" for heart disease.

Statins, one of the most commonly prescribed classes of medication in the West, have some controversial implications, too. Traditionally, doctors have viewed statin drugs as the most effective way to lower high LDL cholesterol. But today, researchers are starting to believe that statins may not be the magic bullet they've always been made out to be.

While studies show that statins can lower LDL cholesterol and reduce the risk of heart attack in people already diagnosed with heart disease, the drugs have not been conclusively shown to help those without a pre-existing heart condition - the majority of people on statins. This is according to several studies, including an analysis of 11 drug trials involving more than 65,000 people.

Of course, taking statins can help save the lives of some people diagnosed with heart disease. But anyone considering statin therapy should weigh the risks, because it does have side effects, including muscle pain, muscle damage, liver damage and potential memory loss.

A recent study also found that taking statins can cause muscle pain during and after vigorous exercise, to the extent that "statin therapy and top athletics seem to be almost incompatible". Research from the University of California found that statin medication can reduce a patient's ability to orgasm.

Ultimately, a healthier diet may be one of the best weapons against heart disease - even better than taking statins. But if you think eating heart-healthy means shunning saturated fat and dietary cholesterol entirely, you could be misguided.

It's becoming more widely understood that eating cholesterol-rich foods such as eggs, once thought to raise blood cholesterol, has minimal effects on lipid levels, while recent research found that eggs could even improve healthy cholesterol levels.

Similarly, science has been unable to establish a link between consuming saturated fat - present in foods such as red meat, pork and butter - and heart disease. Although eating saturated fat and fewer carbohydrates raises LDL cholesterol, doing so also elevates healthy HDL cholesterol and lowers triglycerides, or potentially bad blood fats.

What, then, can you do to prevent heart disease if high LDL isn't the best predictor and taking statins hasn't been shown to limit problems? Here are four tips to help you gain control of your heart health - and future.

1. GET A BETTER

CHOLESTEROL TEST

Knowing your HDL and LDL numbers only tells you a little about your heart health. Many doctors now test patients for additional risk factors, such as triglycerides and C-reactive protein, a blood marker for inflammation that's been linked to hardening of the arteries. Or you could ask your GP for a full cholesterol test, detailing all cholesterol components.

2. EXERCISE

Even if only a little. If there's one thing that predicts the risk of heart attack, it's being out of shape, Abramson says. A 10-year study of 25,000 men found that men who were entirely unfit had the highest risk of heart attack, regardless of their cholesterol numbers.

But you don't have to be a top athlete to reap benefits. Many studies show significant heart-protective effects from modest workouts, such as a brisk three-kilometre walk daily or running eight to 13 kilometres a week. One Harvard study found that men who ran for an hour or more just one day a week reduced their risk of heart attack by 42 per cent and those who lifted weights for 30 minutes or more once a week had a 23 per cent risk reduction. The greater the exercise intensity, the bigger the risk reduction, so aim for at least one hard aerobic workout a week, along with a solid half-hour of weight training.

3. REALISE THAT SOME BAD FOOD MAY BE GOOD

Adopting a healthier approach to nutrition is one of the most effective lifestyle changes you can make to prevent heart disease. Many cardiologists recommend a Mediterranean diet of fruit and vegetables, olive and canola oils and lean fish and chicken, with minimal amounts of saturated fat, red meat and pork.

This is a good starting place, says Stanford's Gardner, but avoiding all red meat and eggs may not be as effective as doctors believe. He points to a major study he helped conduct that found the Atkins Diet, low in carbohydrates and high in animal protein and fats, was better for heart health than three other eating plans: a low-fat, calorie-restrictive approach; the Ornish Diet, a vegetarian plan created by cardiologist Dean Ornish; and the Zone Diet, on which people consume 40 per cent of their daily calories from carbohydrates, 30 per cent from protein and 30 per cent from fat.

At the end of the year-long study, Gardner, a vegetarian, was surprised that those who followed the Atkins Diet raised their good HDL cholesterol levels and lowered their blood pressure and blood triglycerides far more than participants on the other diets.

The lesson? You don't have to avoid animal products if you're at risk of heart disease. Instead, limit your intake of refined, processed or starchy carbohydrates, including white rice, white bread and pasta and potatoes. Opt for beef, eat small amounts of egg if you like and increase your intake of fish, nuts and produce.

4. LOSE A COUPLE OF KILOS

Tipping the scale beyond what's considered healthy correlates with an increased risk of heart disease. How can you tell if you're too heavy for your heart? Most doctors rely on the Body Mass Index (BMI). To calculate it, take your weight in kilograms and divide that figure by your height in metres squared. A BMI of 25 or higher means you're overweight and have an elevated risk of heart disease.

But since BMI doesn't account for differences in body composition (muscle is more dense than fat, so a lean, muscular athlete can register as overweight), consider other factors, such as waist circumference. As a general rule, a waist measurement of less than 80 centimetres for women and 94 centimetres for men is considered healthy. These figures, however, apply to Caucasians and Asian women only. Waist measurements are yet to be determined for all ethnic groups.

CHECK YOUR

VITAL STATS

Most people know that high cholesterol levels have been linked to heart disease but many people are confused about the way cholesterol levels are measured and what the different numbers mean.

Cholesterol levels are measured in millimoles of cholesterol per litre of blood (mmol/L)

2 or less: Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) is bad cholesterol and is thought to be a key marker for heart-disease risk. It should be no higher than 2mmol/L.

1 or more: High-density lipoprotein (HDL) is considered good cholesterol. It is thought to help remove LDL particles from blood. Higher numbers here are better  above 1mmol/L. High levels are strongly associated with a lower risk of heart attack.

Below 1.5: Cholesterol includes triglyceride, a component of cholesterol that relates to blood sugar, and that number should be lower than 1.5mmol/L. High triglyceride levels can cause fatty deposits to build up in the liver and are believed to lead to diabetes and heart disease.

C reactive protein: This is a blood marker for inflammation. Elevated CRP levels have recently become a new critical marker for heart-disease risk. The value is not standard on most cholesterol tests.

SURPRISE STATISTIC Seventy-five per cent of people who have heart attacks have healthy cholesterol. Most of those who have unhealthy cholesterol never suffer the trauma.

Is the Present Therapy for Coronary Artery Disease the Radical Mastectomy of the Twenty-First Century?

Caldwell Esselstyn, MD | 09/03/10

Editor's Note: The following is an article by Caldwell Esselstyn, Jr. MD which appears in the current American Journal of Cardiology. Secondary Source: vegnews.com

To fully grasp how so many smart, right-minded people could get it so wrong, it might help to start with a quick review of medical history. Take the radical mastectomy, conceived by William Halsted1 in the late 19th century. The procedure was intended to remove all cancer cells of the breast, the overlying skin, the underlyingmuscle, and regional lymph nodes (Figure 1). It was mutilating, permanently disfiguring, and no more effective than less radical, less disfiguring procedures. Still, because of the prestige and respectHalsted commanded as a teacher of surgeons, his disciples defended and taught the radical mastectomy at the most revered medical colleges. His extreme surgery was perpetuated for almost a century, until challenges by courageous physicians in Europe2,3 and America,4 along with a prospective randomized study by Dr. Bernard Fisher,5 finally sounded the death knell of this standardized surgical error of the century.

The 21st century analogue to this unfortunate chapter is the interventional and pharmaceutical treatment of coronary artery disease. This approach results in significant mortality, morbidity, and unsustainable expense. Neither the procedures nor the drugs that accompany them treat the cause. Standard care for coronary artery disease is nothing more than palliative. The purveyors of this treatment acknowledge that it is but a stopgap therapy. And as in the case of the radical mastectomy, there is a far more effective, cost-effective, and sustainable treatment. It's simple: advocate a lifestyle of plantbased nutrition, make a bold leap toward a world free of heart disease, and lessen our use of scalpels and drugs.

There is widespread agreement that the Western diet of processed oils, white flour, dairy, and meat progressively causes endothelial dysfunction and injury, diminution of nitric oxide, increased vascular adhesion molecules, endothelial permeability, low-density lipoprotein oxidation, foam cell formation, generation of reactive oxygen species, plaque cap thinning, and plaque rupture, which lead to clinical events. Contributing risk factors include a family history, hypertension, smoking, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes, metabolic syndrome, and obesity.

Medications commonly used for this illness include ! blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers, statins, anticoagulants, and aspirin. The interventions include angioplasty with or without bare-metal or drug-coated stents, atherectomy, and coronary artery bypass surgery. Exercise may be prescribed and smoking cessation encouraged. Some patients may receive nutritional advice froma dietician or nutritional therapist, who often lacks knowledge or training in disease prevention and reversal.

Read the rest of this fascinating article, in PDF format.  Click below for PDF file.

Read the whole story here.





Milwaukee Journal Sentinel article, July 2011

Fox Valley Wellness Center/ Midwest Hyperbarics
180 Knights Way
Fond du Lac, WI 54935
Phone: (920) 922-5433
(877) 676-5433 (LIFE)
Email: info@foxvalleywellness.com

Site Powered By
    Valley Site Builder